Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <000901c1e1f9$6ed8e8e0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> Reply-To: From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:09:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 I know you (Robert) have not got a W98 machine. I've tried as much investigation at this end as I can. I've tried all combinations of v.22 / v.24 here, with / without using setup.ini at all, and editing setup.ini when used to refer to v.22 / v.24 accordingly. There is nothing obvious that I can see. Except possible inconsistencies in the version number. Is it "beta-20011218-4" or "20011218-4"? The screen (that usually says "Keep") has Current = 20011218-4 and New = beta-20011218-4. (However, this wouldn't explain why v.22 did not exhibit the repeated instruction to download a further copy of tetex-beta, that is now exhibited in v.24. Would it? Or maybe the @tetex-beta paragraph in setup.ini has also recently been altered.) Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/