Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:25:48 +0000
Message-ID: <4872-Sun20Jan2002222548+0000-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: 21.5  (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 7.00 under 21.5  (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Marcus Schwartz <mschwa04@tufts.edu>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Reasonable security for remote non-administrative accounts
In-Reply-To: <000101c1a1e7$922462e0$ef984082@tufts.edu>
References: <000101c1a1e7$922462e0$ef984082@tufts.edu>

On Sunday 20 Jan 02, Marcus Schwartz writes:
> I'm trying to set up sshd so I can offer non-root accounts to people who
> I don't want to have full access to my computer.

It was my understanding that you should not expect Cygwin to be secure
enough for this, depending on how careful you need to be.  There is a
FAQ entry "How secure is Cygwin in a multi-user environment?" and the
answer is not secure.  It's an old FAQ entry, but I assume it still
applies.

Regards,
David
(Cygwin FAQ maintainer)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

