Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:05:04 -0500 From: Jason Tishler To: Ralf Habacker Cc: Cygwin Subject: Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing Message-ID: <20011227180503.GD2204@dothill.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ralf Habacker , Cygwin References: <000c01c18e49$22279220$526307d5@BRAMSCHE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000c01c18e49$22279220$526307d5@BRAMSCHE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Ralf, On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:08:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > On analysing this problem I added an option "-l" to the rebase tool to > list dll's imagebase and -size without rebasing. It's very interesting > to see how MS chooses there Imagebase. What about the following alternative solution: $ objdump -p foo.dll | egrep '(ImageBase|SizeOfImage)' ImageBase 68000000 SizeOfImage 0003f000 > Because I hacked this very quick, I have used simple FILE structure > and fopen/fread calls. Perhaps someone like to change this to iostream > functionality. At this point, my priorities are: 1. attempt to contribute rebase to binutils 2. work on the integration with setup.exe After the above is completed, then I would entertain adding such an option if the community deemed it appropriate. But, wouldn't implementing it via ReBaseImage()'s fReBase parameter as opposed to plucking certain bytes out of the executable be a better approach? I presume that this is how MS implements their '-s' (just sum image range) option. Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/