Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:48:43 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Pierre Muller Cc: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH for winnt.h Message-ID: <20011120134843.N14154@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: Corinna Vinschen , Pierre Muller , cygwin@sources.redhat.com References: <4.2.0.58.20011120132147.0166a988@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011120132147.0166a988@ics.u-strasbg.fr>; from muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr on Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:25:05PM +0100 On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 01:25:05PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: > Could the following patch be included into > the winsup/w32api/winnt.h > under the obvious rule ? > (I only have an assignment for GDB). The patch is short enough to go under the "obvious patch" rule. However, without a ChangeLog entry... Could you resend it together with a ChangeLog entry to cygwin-patches? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/