Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <06bc01c16e2a$a7061500$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Stipe Tolj" , "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" Cc: "Corinna Vinschen" References: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20011114124323.C24614@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3BF44A45.9DA8A866@wapme-systems.de> Subject: Re: no more package moratorium? Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:10:00 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Nov 2001 23:08:09.0894 (UTC) FILETIME=[649F7C60:01C16E2A] > > What about existing packages? Specifically, it would be grand if > > tetex-beta would either get fixed or removed. > > IMO, any "released" tagged package should have it's maintainer, who > decides and tracks done error and bugs. So in ER specification we have > a [package] n <-> 1 [maintainer] relation. We have that, it's just recorded in the list archives :}. And hopefully soon to be recorded in setup.hint. IMO this should not be recorded separately from the package metadata (setup.hint). Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/