Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: RE: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin From: Robert Collins To: "Ebrey, Carl" Cc: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" In-Reply-To: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F802A0B678@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk> References: <5DABF7424840D411BE9600508B6621F802A0B678@exchukthis02.experian.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 29 Oct 2001 19:16:01 +1100 Message-Id: <1004343362.9230.142.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2001 08:20:13.0698 (UTC) FILETIME=[88835E20:01C16052] On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 20:05, Ebrey, Carl wrote: > Okay, no doubt I'm going to get horribly flamed for this but here goes... > What's wrong with the j2sdk? Or are we going for native binaries from Java > code here? 1) no mount table support. 2) dos vs unix path issues. 3) native binaries as you mention. 1) and 2) are the biggies in my book. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/