Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:01:32 +0100 Message-ID: <4168-Sun23Sep2001230133+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I); VM 6.92 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid From: David Starks-Browning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ross Smith Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: new FAQ entry refers to "Red Hat support contract" In-Reply-To: <3BAE5374.F3A6B041@ihug.co.nz> References: <8019-Sun23Sep2001123103+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> <3BAE5374.F3A6B041@ihug.co.nz> On Monday 24 Sep 01, Ross Smith writes: > David Starks-Browning wrote: > > > > ... This includes Windows > > 95/98/ME/NT/2000, and, once it is officially released by > > Microsoft, Windows XP. > > Just a small suggestion: This phrasing may lead to a bunch of mail to > this list the day after XP is released, along "you said it would work on > the release version, but I get..." lines. That's reasonable, it's bug reporting, which is fine as long as it's after XP is released. > Perhaps something like > "...and, once it is officially released by Microsoft and we have had a > chance to work out any problems that show up, Windows XP." Doesn't seem worth it to me. David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/