Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
To: "Noel L Yap" <yap_noel@jpmorgan.com>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: link(2) and atomic file creation on NFS
References: <85256AB7.0071B8B2.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com>
From: James Youngman <jay@gnu.org>
Date: 29 Aug 2001 22:11:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <85256AB7.0071B8B2.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com>
Message-ID: <x64rqqsh9u.fsf@no-such-thing-as-a.free-lunch.demon.co.uk>
Lines: 28
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

"Noel L Yap" <yap_noel@jpmorgan.com> writes:

> Would a mkdir do the trick?
> 
> Noel

Ordinarily, yes.  (As CVS does, of course).

However, SCCS itself (i.e. the venerable AT&T-as-was product) uses
lock _files_ of the form z.foo.  I hesitate before using lock
directories instead, because interoperability is the only (!) priority
of CSSC; I cannot afford to asopt a strategy which may fail to
interoperate completely with SCCS itself. 


> I have some existing code which uses link(2) to achieve atomic locking
> on Unix over NFS (since O_EXCL does not work over NFS).  The
> application (a GPLed SCCS clone) now compiles under Cygwin, but one
> remaining problem is that the lockfile code uses link(2) to create a
> hard link to an open file.


[snip]

-- 
James Youngman
Manchester, UK.  +44 161 226 7339
PGP (GPG) key ID for <jay@gnu.org> is 64A95EE5 (F1B83152).

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

