Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:31:07 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: smiles <gulbaym@itu.edu.tr>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygwin1.3.2 + ipv6patch
Message-ID: <20010809143107.D15304@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: smiles <gulbaym@itu.edu.tr>, cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <002b01c1207c$5fad21e0$074f4ba0@yurtlar.itu.edu.tr> <20010808234057.C12368@redhat.com> <20010808234736.A12428@redhat.com> <000b01c120f6$eba09d60$074f4ba0@yurtlar.itu.edu.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <000b01c120f6$eba09d60$074f4ba0@yurtlar.itu.edu.tr>; from gulbaym@itu.edu.tr on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:15:42PM +0300

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:15:42PM +0300, smiles wrote:
>Hello,
>See the patch from this URL pls.
>http://win6.goto.info.waseda.ac.jp/Cygwin/

Not understanding what I am saying?  Check with the *author* if you have
problems with his patch.

And THERE IS NO NEED TO CC ME WHEN RESPONDING TO THE CYGWIN MAILING LIST.
I specifically reset the Reply-To so that I don't have do see this crap
in my inbox.

cgf

>----- Original Message -----
>From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
>Cc: <gulbaym@itu.edu.tr>
>Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:47 AM
>Subject: Re: cygwin1.3.2 + ipv6patch
>
>
>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 11:40:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:38:29AM +0300, smiles wrote:
>> >>Hi,
>> >>Can I set and use an ipv6 tunnel settings to the ipv6 patched version of
>> >>cygwin 1.3.2 ?
>> >
>> >There's an ipv6 patched version of cygwin?  Where did you find this?
>>
>> Hmm.  Google seems to think so.
>>
>> Since this patch is not provided here, you should really check with the
>> author.  I don't want to get into the habit of supporting cygwin
>> variants here unless I'm convinced that the author is an active
>> participant, and even then...
>>
>> cgf
>>
>> --
>> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

-- 
cgf@cygnus.com                        Red Hat, Inc.
http://sources.redhat.com/            http://www.redhat.com/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

