Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: From: "Anyos Bela" To: Cc: "'Troy Noble'" Subject: RE: 1.3.2: gcc bug (NT 4.0) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:35:24 +0200 Message-ID: <001001c116a9$602a8d10$b86e10ac@evosoft.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 First of all thanks for the quick answer... Like I mentioned in brackets this code fragment is explicitely created for testing purpuses. I don't intend to use it as it appeared in the mail, not talking about compiling it. It was created to test the preprocessor only ! The printf() was there just to "do" something meaningful :) I also tried it on a Linux box with gcc installed but it seemed working well. I try it again and get back with the result. If it doesn't work, I'll report the bug to a gcc specific list, like you suggested. Thanks again, Bela -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/