Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <034601c11505$0a368710$6d07a8c0@miro> From: "Michael Scheibler" To: Subject: is cygwin lame??? Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:26:32 +0200 Organization: OneVision Software AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 We are experiencing a major difference in performance between bash on a real unix system and on cygwin. I can't imagine that this is a problem of Windows - it might be a catastrophe in os design, but you can't say that it's THAT slow. Now we looked at out network monitoring tools and found this: . . . . 31384 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_READ Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS Offset: 598 Length: 1 31385 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_CHECK_IF_POSSIBLE Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS Read: Offset: 599 Length: 1 31386 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_READ Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS Offset: 599 Length: 1 31387 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_CHECK_IF_POSSIBLE Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS Read: Offset: 600 Length: 1 31388 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_READ Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS Offset: 600 Length: 1 . . . . There are hundreds of these messages. Does this mean, that bash reads a shell script one byte after the other?? Z:\ is mapped to a linux raid machine using Samba. Is this a problem of Cygwin, Samba, or is our monitoring tool lying? Michael -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/