Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010717062851.00af2218@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz@pop3.cris.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:31:14 -0700 To: "James E. LaBarre" From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: Bug in pthread_cond_signal under Win NT 4.0 Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: <3B541B75.1FAD22E6@bestweb.net> References: <00e201c10e40$103e51e0$806410ac@local> <5.1.0.14.2.20010716152233.01e4a168@pop3.cris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed James, Whether or not that argument is valid, as Robert Cook has already contributed his own refutation, I have never once ever on any list at any time since I've used the Internet in any capacity for any purpose, issued such a complaint or anything even remotely resembling one. I remain staunchly opposed to Reply-To alterations by mailing list software. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 04:03 2001-07-17, James E. LaBarre wrote: >If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right >to complain when replies don't get sent to the list. > > >Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > > Wow! Synchronicity. > > > > This just came up on the Macintosh Java Developers' list today. > > > > Please read this, if you think the Reply-To business is a good idea ('cause > > it ain't): > > . > > > > Randall Schulz > > Mountain View, CA USA > > > > At 15:12 2001-07-16, James E. LaBarre wrote: > > >Isn't there a way to get the CygWin mail lists to include the "Reply To" > > >field, so that this would automatically be done with most email apps? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/