Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:34:29 -0400 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Fred Yankowski , pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygrunsrv-0.94-1 Message-ID: <20010716113429.D614@dothill.com> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Fred Yankowski , pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010716171908.V25442@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Organization: Dot Hill Systems Corp. Corrina, On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 05:19:08PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > > What about trying to tackle this from another point of view? I'm not > > sure if this is doable or acceptable, but what about adding logic to the > > Cygwin DLL so that it does not send SIGHUP (to itself) when the process is > > running under cygrunsrv? > > Hmmm, sounds like an ugly hack to me... Which is why I couched the above with "acceptable." However, there are other Unix daemons (e.g., inetd) that will respond to SIGHUP in a similar manner. Is modifying all of them, instead of just the Cygwin DLL, better? Jason -- Jason Tishler Director, Software Engineering Phone: 732.264.8770 x235 Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: 732.264.8798 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/