Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:39:57 -0700 From: "H . J . Lu" To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: zackw@stanford.edu, dj@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Another RFC: regex in libiberty Message-ID: <20010608103957.A6471@lucon.org> References: <9003-Fri08Jun2001100651+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010608095932.S979@stanford.edu> <20010608100532.B5728@lucon.org> <4098-Fri08Jun2001202600+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <4098-Fri08Jun2001202600+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:26:00PM +0300 On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:26:00PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > I have been telling people that you should use regex.c in glibc if > > all possible if you are using gnu-regex. Every package which uses > > gnu-regex should have a configuration option not to use the included > > gnu-regex. > > Sed does have such an option (I used it to build the binary with > Spencer's regex which is the standard regex included in the DJGPP > library). Glad to hear that. It makes even more senses when gnu-regex is the standard regex in the system C library. H.J. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple