Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com To: eliz@is.elta.co.il Cc: dj@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Another RFC: regex in libiberty In-Reply-To: <9003-Fri08Jun2001100651+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <9003-Fri08Jun2001100651+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94b25 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-URL: http://www.codesourcery.com Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC From: Mark Mitchell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010608091753L.mitchell@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 09:17:53 -0700 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990425(IM115) Lines: 14 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The two contenders seem to be a modified GNU regex and the >> ever-popular Henry Spencer's regex. Does anyone have any >> strong opinions for either of these, or against any regex in >> libiberty at all? My opinion may or may not matter on this debate, but here it is. Since libiberty for use in GNU software, we must use GNU regex. If GNU regex is slow, we should make it faster. -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple