Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 22:22:31 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: Enoch Wu Subject: Re: cvs broken on win2k after recent cygwin upgrade: "The descriptor is a file, not a socket" Message-ID: <20010414222231.A805@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Enoch Wu References: <002e01c0b29d$c880d5b0$0401a8c0@trinity> <010e01c0bafa$f04d9320$2b904f86@trinity> <07fd01c0c3dc$cf05f730$0200a8c0@voyager> <20010414161237.A4149051@MELON> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010414161237.A4149051@MELON>; from ewu@eskimo.com on Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 04:13:53PM -0700 On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Enoch Wu wrote: > >Hi all, > >I had the same problem with telnet a while back. Telnet & cvs update have >one thing in common -- Unix sockets. I could telnet using Win98 telnet but not >Cygwin telnet. At the time my position was: I would let it rest, in the hope >that cygwin developers would get to that problem soon. AFAI, neither telnet nor cvs use "unix sockets". They use regular winsock sockets. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple