Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <3AB229B4.18CAEA6@kpnqwest.no>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:56:52 +0100
From: "Stein M. Eliassen" <steinme@kpnqwest.no>
Organization: KPNQwest Norway
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Default shell
References: <3AB1595A.9C2002F9@kpnqwest.no> <3AB21447.3E584516@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Earnie Boyd wrote:
> 
> Are you asking if it is ok or are you saying that you've tried it and it
> works for you.
> 

At the time I was asking, I was asking for advise to do it or not, and possible
how.

But now, several hours later and after changing the comspec from the
controlpanel;
I don't think the change had any effects.

The reason I asked was because I was messing around with the at-command and
thought it might could make some difference to have bash as default-shell.

For the time being I'm running at-commands like "c:\cygwin\bin\bash --login -i 
script_to_run_including_path.sh"

Is this the preferred way of running at-commands with bash?

Regards
Stein

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple