Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15016.56290.258169.182575@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:34:26 +0100
From: Ralf Fassel <ralf@akutech.de>
To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: different behaviour of bash and sh
In-Reply-To: <3AA8D8B1.A873899@yahoo.com>
References: <15015.59568.965521.675165@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
	<3AA8CFB3.4B515116@yahoo.com>
	<15016.54025.593153.95134@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
	<3AA8D8B1.A873899@yahoo.com>
Organization: Akustik Technologie Goettingen (ATG)

* Earnie Boyd
| I was pointing your fallacy especially to the bash-bugs list.

Ok, point taken.  True, I wasn't aware that sh != bash in cygwin.

| If you feel that ash is incorrect then please, download the source,
| fix it, submit a patch to cygwin-apps@cygwin.com for consideration.

Business as usual :-)

R'

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple