Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Mailer: 21.2  (beta41) "Polyhymnia" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 8 I)
To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
Cc: Daniel Barclay <Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com>,
        ehud@unix.simonwiesel.co.il, cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C work?
References: <3A5F5F1C.3879B2CF@digitalfocus.com>
	<3A5E32A6.557FEAE7@digitalfocus.com> <uyg0ip3ddt.fsf@tcsi.com>
	<3A5F5F1C.3879B2CF@digitalfocus.com>
	<4.3.1.2.20010112164936.022cabc8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
	<4.3.1.2.20010116141835.026d2cb0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
	<4.3.1.2.20010118112140.026d70b0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Face: I-*}xvwusAv%MlABo'jVNP7TDXf5bb*L[q,r{DnsR1GoL07^Wf)sAu%>!LjXAFlZZN+`OQu
	}?#du]C)[*%ERKR#+l#sX'EoNbSO~|.x@ogoS5|"-u?<s5ViLslvYMlj7_n!Tq1m@xt2Bhj4[Zg+e?
	/Yy\SE`V?%v~kRU3GoS1f&U]}
From: "Dr. Volker Zell" <Dr.Volker.Zell@oracle.com>
Date: 19 Jan 2001 01:48:37 +0100
In-Reply-To: "Larry Hall's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:22:56 -0500"
Message-ID: <kvg0igjriy.fsf@vzell.de.oracle.com>
Lines: 40
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Polyhymnia)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

>>>>> "RFK" == RFK Partners, Inc <Larry> writes:

    RFK> At 11:22 AM 1/18/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
    >> "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
    >> > 
    >> > At 02:15 PM 1/16/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
    >> > >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
    >> > > >
    >> > >...
    >> > > > ... However,
    >> > > > I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like
    >> > > > XEmacs.  You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other
    >> > > > Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this.
    >> > >
    >> > >How different is XEmacs from GNU/NTEmacs?
    >> > >
    >> > >(I don't do much (any) Lisp programming, so I guess I'm just asking about
    >> > >default configuration and about compatibility of add-ons like JDE.)
    >> > 
    >> > Sorry, I was a little unclear.  AFAIK, there is a Cygwin version of XEmacs
    >> > but there isn't one for NTEmacs.  My main point was that signal functionality
    >> > can be handled by Cygwin (and is) or by the O/S.  However, the signal coming
    >> > from a Win32 app doesn't get the same response out of Cygwin as one coming
    >> > from a Cygwin app.  If you have problems in this area, your best bet is to
    >> > use Cygwin-enabled versions of apps when available.
    >> 
    >> I just meant how different is XEmacs from NTEmacs to the user?  If I switch 
    >> from NTEmacs (which I'm used to) to XEmacs (which I don't know), how big a 
    >> change is that likely to been (from the Emacs user point of view)?


    RFK> I, of course, am not qualified to answer that question since I don't use
    RFK> Emacs at all.  Others might be able to help.  You may be better off asking
    RFK> this question on some Emacs list though...

I've done the switch a long time ago. NO big deal.
Just switch of the toolbar and it feels like Emacs.

Ciao
  Volker


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple