Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010118112140.026d70b0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: lhall@pop.ma.ultranet.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:22:56 -0500
To: Daniel Barclay <Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com>
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
Subject: Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C work?
Cc: ehud@unix.simonwiesel.co.il, cygwin@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <3A671842.3C417BDD@digitalfocus.com>
References: <3A5F5F1C.3879B2CF@digitalfocus.com>
 <3A5E32A6.557FEAE7@digitalfocus.com>
 <uyg0ip3ddt.fsf@tcsi.com>
 <3A5F5F1C.3879B2CF@digitalfocus.com>
 <4.3.1.2.20010112164936.022cabc8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
 <4.3.1.2.20010116141835.026d2cb0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 11:22 AM 1/18/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> > 
> > At 02:15 PM 1/16/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> > >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> > > >
> > >...
> > > > ... However,
> > > > I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like
> > > > XEmacs.  You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other
> > > > Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this.
> > >
> > >How different is XEmacs from GNU/NTEmacs?
> > >
> > >(I don't do much (any) Lisp programming, so I guess I'm just asking about
> > >default configuration and about compatibility of add-ons like JDE.)
> > 
> > Sorry, I was a little unclear.  AFAIK, there is a Cygwin version of XEmacs
> > but there isn't one for NTEmacs.  My main point was that signal functionality
> > can be handled by Cygwin (and is) or by the O/S.  However, the signal coming
> > from a Win32 app doesn't get the same response out of Cygwin as one coming
> > from a Cygwin app.  If you have problems in this area, your best bet is to
> > use Cygwin-enabled versions of apps when available.
>
>I just meant how different is XEmacs from NTEmacs to the user?  If I switch 
>from NTEmacs (which I'm used to) to XEmacs (which I don't know), how big a 
>change is that likely to been (from the Emacs user point of view)?


I, of course, am not qualified to answer that question since I don't use
Emacs at all.  Others might be able to help.  You may be better off asking
this question on some Emacs list though...



Larry Hall                              lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

