Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:32:31 -0500 From: Charles Krug To: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Reproduced it finally Message-ID: <20001206133231.A17614@pentek.com> References: <20001206094141.D17209@pentek.com> <20001204203948.9541.qmail@web117.yahoomail.com> <20001204181002.C14648@pentek.com> <20001204182503.C28620@redhat.com> <20001206094141.D17209@pentek.com> <20001206121754.E17209@pentek.com> <4.3.1.2.20001206122555.020e0bd0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20001206122555.020e0bd0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 12:26:53PM -0500 On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 12:26:53PM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > And I assume you know advapi32.dll is in your path as sh.exe sees it, right? Yes, I just verified that, both in bash and in subshells, whether bash or sh. Were this the case, wouldn't it fail as soon as sh tried to spawn its first Cygwin application, rather than waiting until the 20th or 30th item or even longer? I'm curious about the fact that it sometimes completes the rest of the script after the failure--sometimes with additional occurances of the same failure, but on occasion without further error. And again, I've run the thing at least once with no errors from a fresh unpacking. The inconsistancy what I find must curious. Charles -- Charles Krug, Jr. Applications Engineer Pentek Corp 1 Park Way Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458 -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com