Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: helmut.dipper@sicad.de (at relayer david.siemens.de)
Message-ID: <3A0966F3.34F75B3D@sicad.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:45:07 +0100
From: Helmut Dipper <helmut.dipper@sicad.de>
Organization: SICAD Utilities
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4m)
X-Accept-Language: en,de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: missing inheritance of exported shell function
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I use following bash-version:

bash -version delivers:
GNU bash, version 2.04.0(1)-release (i586-pc-cygwin)
Copyright 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

on Windows-NT 4.0 SP5.

During my tests I found following behaviour:

Given the definitions

VAR="xxx" ; export VAR
function fct() { pwd; } ; export -f fct

Consider the environments of subsequent started shells:

- interactive shell "bash"
  variable VAR and function fct are inherited

- interactive shell "sh" or
  shell-script with #!/bin/sh or
  shell-script with #!/bin/bash
  variable VAR is inherited but not function fct

Question:
Why is there a difference in the inheritance between
variables and functions?

Regards
Helmut Dipper

-- 
Helmut Dipper			| SICAD Utilities GmbH
phone: +49 89 636 41558	| Otto-Hahn-Ring 6
___fax: +49 89 636 49613 | D-81730 Muenchen

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

