Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Message-ID: <39E7A3C0.A50DD6F2@SunyataSystems.Com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:07:28 -0400
From: "Laurence F. Wood" <LaurenceWood@SunyataSystems.Com>
Organization: Sunyata Systems Corporation
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Abbey <cabbey@chartermi.net>
CC: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Cygwin Performance Info
References: <4.3.2.7.0.20001013184237.00b6cd70@pop.bresnanlink.net>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F"

--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

From your response it sounds like if I have a compute bound application, i.e.
one that does not make system calls, there is no hit.  However, what about
memory allocation and deallocation?

Chris Abbey wrote:

> At 19:23 10/13/00 -0400, Laurence F. Wood wrote:
> >Can someone tell me where the performance hit is in cygwin unix
> >emulation?
>
> whichever part you use the most inside your tightest inner loop.
>
> seriously.
>
> that's a big huge open ended question (not about cygwin, about ANY
> library/platform) that is as specific to your application as you can
> get. For example, if you spend 75% of your computing day manipulating
> text files and piping them and greping them and running file utils
> against them then the cr/lf translation may be a big hit for you.
> On the otherhand if most of your computation in a day is spent answering
> requests that come in on tcp/ip sockets then the remapping of winsock
> to netinet.h functions maybe your major headache. (note, I'm not trying
> to imply that either function has a performance problem, merely that they
> would be representative places that would have high invocation counts
> in the course of the given activity.)
>
> To really answer that for your application/workload then you need to
> get some form of performance detailing that can tell you how much time
> you are spending in any given method and how often it's called.
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="LaurenceWood.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Laurence F. Wood
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="LaurenceWood.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Wood;Laurence
tel;fax:732-701-9748
tel;work:732-701-9746
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.sunyatasystems.com
org:Sunyata Systems Corporation
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:LaurenceWood@SunyataSystems.com
title:Chief Science Officer
fn:Laurence
end:vcard


--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
--------------6AF426A2C47D16DA9342045F--

