Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:36:32 -0400 From: Chet Ramey To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: getopts missing with latest cygwin Reply-To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu Message-ID: <1001010143632.AA82047.SM@nike.ins.cwru.edu> Read-Receipt-To: chet@po.CWRU.Edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-In-Reply-To: Message from cgf@cygnus.com of Mon, 9 Oct 2000 18:57:24 -0400 (id <20001009185724.B9752@cygnus.com>) > The "ash maintainer" is either me or Corinna. FWIW, I don't plan on > changing this. I want ash to be small and fast when running configure > scripts. I've stripped ash down to support only the minimal set of > functionality found in older versions of UNIX. I use the /bin/sh on > Digital UNIX 3.2 as a reference. You might as well use the V7 sh man page as your reference, since the version you're using provides little more. Does the cygwin sh support shell functions? (Those weren't in v7.) > FYI, getopts can also be a separate program although we don't supply it > with cygwin, currently. No, it can't. A separate program cannot propagate the changes to $OPTIND and $OPTARG back to the parent shell. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet) Chet Ramey, CWRU chet@po.CWRU.Edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com