Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:25:34 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>
To: "'pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org'" <pgsql-ports@postgresql.org>
Cc: Cygwin <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL and Cygwin 1.1.x
Message-ID: <20000929092534.J1018@DP>
References: <243E56C0AC1BF74989C13687055917450AE776@exchange.mmp.plzen-city.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009291454290.363-100000@peter>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009291454290.363-100000@peter>; from peter_e@gmx.net on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:03:42PM +0200
Organization: Dot Hill Systems Corp.

On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:03:42PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> OTOH, B20 is technically a beta release, and if dropping it would provide
> for significant simplifications, then the Cygwin user community could make
> that call.

IMO, I think that it is very reasonable to drop support for B20 because
Cygnus themselves do not really support B20 anymore.  I routinely see
responses from the core Cygwin team to posts on the list regarding B20
issues that encourage upgrading to the latest Cygwin Net Release.

Jason

-- 
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering       Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corporation         Fax:   +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7             Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA                 WWW:   http://www.dothill.com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

