Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com X-Server-Uuid: b85f21a3-cfd1-11d3-8401-00104bf46ab7 Message-ID: <39AE8DD5.65E41DB3@stealth.nsc.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 09:54:45 -0700 From: "Dennis Moolenaar x5289" Reply-to: Dennis.Moolenaar@nsc.com Organization: National Semiconductor X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Problem building native GCC 2.95.2 within Cygwin 1.1.4 References: <001701c01314$54c38fb0$92d698d1@hotrod> <84251635012.20000831104227@logos-m.ru> X-WSS-ID: 15B053631770914-15-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am trying to build GCC 2.95.2 (from gcc-2.95.2-2-src.tar.gz) on Cygwin 1.1.4. This works but the resulting compiler generates different code than the gcc compiler which comes with Cygwin 1.1.4. Both compile the same file with the same options(-march=i486 -O3 -S etc....) So far the difference seems to be scheduling but it impact performance. Could someone tell me how I can build exactly the same compiler as shipped with Cygwin 1.1.4. Reason for this is that I have a different x86 architecture and I want to tweak the 386.md file a tiny bit but this is meaningless if the resulting code is not comparable with the 'original' gcc................... Any input is greatly appreciated. Dennis -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com