Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Message-ID: <38CD2C3C.5B308FA5@mindmaker.hu> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:58:20 +0100 From: Levente Farkas Reply-To: lfarkas@mindmaker.hu Organization: Mindmaker Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: hu,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: bug in ctype.h References: <38CD205F.1ADDE77B@mindmaker.hu> <20000313125547.B1933@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 06:07:43PM +0100, Levente Farkas wrote: > >hi, > >I thing it's a real bug in ctype.h in cygwin: > >------------- > >#define _U 01 > >#define _L 02 > >#define _N 04 > >#define _S 010 > >#define _P 020 > >#define _C 040 > >#define _X 0100 > >#define _B 0200 > >-------------- > >and there is no undef pair of these defines. ok you can use every > >name with starts with _, but it's a real nightmare (the _X is the > >worst). > > Um, how would you undef these? They're used in macros. that's another problem:-) but simple after use #undef _X > It was my understanding that symbols that begin with "_" were supposed > to be the province of a system library and are not supposed to be > used by user programs. Or was it "__". I can never remember. almost both, but such a macros are anoying anyway. -- lfarkas "The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is ruining the bliss of ignorance." -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com