Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991205220603.00be6de0@london.beasys.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 22:06:03 +0000
To: martin@xemacs.org, XEmacs Patches <xemacs-patches@xemacs.org>
From: Andy Piper <andy@xemacs.org>
Subject: RE: gcc brokeness
Cc: "Todd Goodman" <tsg@bonedaddy.net>, <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>,
        Eric Christopher <echristo@cygnus.com>, cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com,
        cgf|@cygnus.com
In-Reply-To: <14408.40281.802783.638154@lasker.666.com>
References: <3.0.5.32.19991203124749.00bb6c90@london.beasys.com>
 <3.0.5.32.19991202160010.009b6b50@london.beasys.com>
 <3.0.5.32.19991203124749.00bb6c90@london.beasys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 08:49 PM 12/3/99 -0800, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>Cygnus and Cygwin guys, you're not off the hook yet.  You still need
>to fix this serious bug!

>-O2 -fno-strength-reduce  gives  clean compile
>
>So a reasonable guess is that strength reduction optimizations are
>broken.

Well, it looks like these optimizations are also repsonsible for all my X
lossage. Xpm compiled with these crashes XEmacs, Xt compiled with these
just doesn't work at all. So I would say the problem is pretty comprehensive.

I would recommend anybody using cygwin 1.0 compiles with
-fno-strength-reduce for everything.

andy
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Andy Piper
Senior Consultant Architect, BEA Systems Ltd

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com