Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie.com@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Message-ID: <4D0A23B3F74DD111ACCD00805F31D8100DB91539@RED-MSG-50>
From: Bill Tutt <billtut@microsoft.com>
To: "'Mumit Khan'" <khan@thor.xraylith.wisc.edu>,
        Michael Weiser
	 <michael@weiser.saale-net.de>
Cc: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: RE: windres and CONTROL object 
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 10:42:47 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

Win9x doesn't have all of the Unicode versions of the APIs that NT does, and
just to be annoying instead of not defining the entry point, they define the
entrypoint for the function and just always return an error. So you can't
even use GetProcAddress() to find out if Win9x supports a Unicode versin of
an API reliably. Aren't people sily? :)

Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mumit Khan [mailto:khan@nanotech.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 9:25 AM
> To: Michael Weiser
> Cc: cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject: Re: windres and CONTROL object 
> 
> 
> Michael Weiser <michael@weiser.saale-net.de> writes:
> > Aren't they unicode by default on Win32?
> 
> Win32 has distinct API for ASCII and Unicode, so no, it's not unicode
> by default on win32. 
> 
> Regards,
> Mumit
> 
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
> 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

