Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Message-ID: <013801be5ea8$3b8e22c0$29acdfd0@InspirePharm.Com>
From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com>
To: "DJ Delorie" <dj@delorie.com>
Cc: "cygwin" <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin participation threshold
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 16:13:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800



>
>> Their product does not depend on Cygwin, but it does provide
>> switches to use Cygwin headers and libraries for porting purposes.
>> The fact is they got a commercial F77 and F90 which can use Cygwin
>> headers and libraries, makes it a really attractive product.
>
>In that case, it still acts to mkae cygwin more popular, which
>hopefully means that more people will use it in general, etc.
>

Absolutely true.  I guess PGi is the only product right now which offers
a
Cygwin compability, with F77/F90 and HPF for single and multiprocessors
machines.

That was the reason i decided to go for it.  To be honest G77 still lags
behind a normal F77 compiler.


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com