From: cgf@cygnus.com (Christopher G. Faylor) Subject: Re: Problem with Win95 30 Jan 1999 07:15:32 GMT Message-ID: <78ubik$ca4$1@cronkite.cygnus.com> References: <326a31e2.36afc2fe@aol.com> <199901280931.BAA15177.cygnus.gnu-win32@shell4.ba.best.com> X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test63 (15 March 1998) In article <199901280931.BAA15177.cygnus.gnu-win32@shell4.ba.best.com>, Glenn Spell wrote: >I prefer not to try the current snapshots (which are B21) since >registry and mount functions seem to be in a such a state of flux. >For now, I'm a happy camper with B20.1. Actually, the reason that we are suggesting that people use the 1/15 snapshot is because it *doesn't* have any registry or mount changes. >> Maybe it's better to use mounts always. > >I don't know. I expect mounts will be required for full functionality >at some point in the future. No. The whole point of the changes that Geoff is making is to *not* require mounts. -- cgf@cygnus.com http://www.cygnus.com/