From: Ssiddiqi@InspirePharm.Com (Suhaib M. Siddiqi) Subject: Re: G77 fork problems 21 Jan 1999 01:42:22 -0800 Message-ID: <006901be44a4$22667d60$29acdfd0.cygnus.gnu-win32@InspirePharm.Com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Craig Burley" Cc: , , , , , Yes for your first comment. Second, i was thanking him. He deserves many more thanks for his friendly and detailed answers whenever I wrote to him. And by the way thanks to you to for this kind of e-mail. Suhaib Original Message ----- From: Craig Burley To: Cc: ; ; ; ; ; Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:50 PM Subject: Re: G77 fork problems >>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to >>me -- personally. > >Could you elaborate? I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't* provide >a wrapper for fork(). Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit >provided in his (sample) wrapper? If so, he's the one to thank, not >g77! > > tq vm, (burley) >- >For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to >"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help". > - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".