From: rhempel@bmts.com (Ralph Hempel) Subject: RE: [B20.1] Win95 vs. Win98 for development 14 Jan 1999 22:53:40 -0800 Message-ID: <000401be4015$d19d7240$1e4dbfce.cygnus.gnu-win32@pro150> References: <852566F9.004D4DF9.00@D51MTA10.pok.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: > For those who have access to both platforms, does Win98 appear to be more > stable for development using B20.1 than Win95? Or, are they fairly equal > in quality and stability? > Ummmmm, it used to be that Win95 was way better than Win3.1 because you only have to reboot your machine once or twice a week (depending on what you are doing). I have found Win98 to be WAY more stable, but then I haven't benn diddling around with my machine as much as I used to. The long and short of it is that I find Win98 more stable, but this is a relative measure. Your mileage may vary... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ------------------------------------------------------ The train stops at the train station, The bus stops at the bus station, So why am I sitting at a work station? ------------------------------------------------------ Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com ------------------------------------------------------ - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".