From: N8TM@aol.com Subject: Re: mounts, ls, and filename completion 21 Aug 1998 15:12:25 -0700 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sarnold@earthling.net Cc: gnu-win32@cygnus.com In a message dated 8/20/98 4:39:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, sarnold@coyote.rain.org writes: > How about just documenting the behavior of the mount command? and the similarities and differences of symlink (ln -s) I get the impression that one can't count on it working after the contains of a symlinked file are changed. Maybe that's why mount is recommended, but mount is too permanent, while ln -s is too impermanent. - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".