From: garbanzo@hooked.net (Alex)
Subject: Re: X11R6.3 binaries
13 Nov 1997 15:50:09 -0800
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971113152301.275F-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
References: <199711121320.NAA20814@out5.ibm.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
To: vischne@ibm.net
Cc: gnu-win32@cygnus.com



On Wed, 12 Nov 1997 vischne@ibm.net wrote:

> All this talk about X11R6.3.  I think it's really impressive, but there is
> one loose thread:  In Linux and other Unix flavors, you have a local
> loopback so that the X-server doesn't have to use the network to start up.
> It would make an enormous difference on useability of the X libraries if
> some localhost hack were built into the system.

Perhaps I missed something, but doesn't 127.0.0.1 work as a loopback
device (it seems to for me, but I haven't tried X)?

- alex

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
