From: Bernd.Schilpp@brokat.de (Bernd Schilpp) Subject: Re: What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32??? 17 Oct 1997 01:47:05 -0700 Message-ID: <34462208.B3FC3369.cygnus.gnu-win32@brokat.de> References: <199710152130.OAA20769@cirdan.cygnus.com> Reply-To: Bernd.Schilpp@brokat.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Peter Dalgaard BSA Cc: Geoffrey Noer , gnu-win32@cygnus.com Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote: > Geoffrey Noer writes: > > > > > > Yes, I've tried that and it certainly seems to be a class act, > > > although not as ambitious as cygwin32. > > > > From what I have heard, RSXNT sounds like it does significantly > > less but isn't beta quality. I've also heard that nobody is actively > > maintaining RSXNT -- anyone know differently? > > As far as I can tell, the author is still around, but hasn't posted > anything on the net since the summer holidays. The current version is > from March 97, so it's not exactly rapidly changing, but it's probably > a bit early to declare it dead. I know from Rainer Schnitker that there will be a new version (1.4) of RSXNT with some improvements. But 1.4 will not come this October. - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".