From: garbanzo@hooked.net (Alex) Subject: Re: Another problem with ls ... 5 Oct 1997 11:25:32 -0700 Message-ID: References: <3437A341.FF09840B@prairienet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII To: gnu-win32@cygnus.com On Sun, 5 Oct 1997, Bizzaro wrote: > > > I have a different problem with ls: a "ls -l" of a directory on a > > > remote disk mounted using "Map Network Drive..." from the Windows 95 > > > "Windows Explorer" returns rather odd numbers for the file sizes. The > > > DOS "dir" command, however, returns the right file sizes. > > > > I _think_ it is a known problem that network drives do strange things to > > GNU-Win32. I don't know of any fixes at the moment. Does the unc mapping > > give you the same errors? > > I just tried it, mapping to my Linux box with samba. It reports the correct > file sizes. Perhaps it is more with whatever type of system you are connecting > to. Tried what? The drive mapping or the unc pathname? What type of network was the erronous drive mounted with? - alex - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".