From: garbanzo@hooked.net (Alex) Subject: RE: bash performance not so gooood 18 Sep 1997 00:43:45 -0700 Message-ID: References: <01BCC413.5EC283C0@sos> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII To: gnu-win32@cygnus.com On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: > dahms@ifk20.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de wrote: > > > > I'd like to know the results for OpenNT 2.0, too. > > However, OpenNT replaces the MS posix.dll, and so does, I think, UWIN... > > UWIN is not a posix subsystem like OpenNT. UWIN runs on top of Win32 API like cygwin. > > > But without doubt, Linux on the same box would win hands down 8-) > > Shell scripts runs much faster on linux, but cpu eating tasks (like compilation) requires almost the same time. Actually, no. FreeBSD seems much faster on two different machines than 95 was at compiling. Using -pipe on fbsd made things even faster. - alex - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".