From: sos@prospect.com.ru (Sergey Okhapkin)
Subject: RE: bash performance not so gooood
17 Sep 1997 22:32:10 -0700
Message-ID: <01BCC413.5EC283C0.cygnus.gnu-win32@sos>
To: "DKhosla@Compaq.com" <DKhosla@Compaq.com>,
        "'dahms@ifk20.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de'"
	 <dahms@ifk20.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Cc: "gnu-win32@cygnus.com" <gnu-win32@cygnus.com>

dahms@ifk20.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de wrote:
> 
> I'd like to know the results for OpenNT 2.0, too.
> However, OpenNT replaces the MS posix.dll, and so does, I think, UWIN...

UWIN is not a posix subsystem like OpenNT. UWIN runs on top of Win32 API like cygwin.

> But without doubt, Linux on the same box would win hands down 8-)

Shell scripts runs much faster on linux, but cpu eating tasks (like compilation) requires almost the same time.

-- 
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia
Looking for a job

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
