From: bje@air.net.au (Ben Elliston)
Subject: Performance
3 May 1997 09:41:26 -0700
Approved: cygnus.gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970503180007.269B-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@mailhub.air.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Original-To: gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32@cygnus.com

Someone on another mailing list suggested the applications ported to Win32
using Cygwin are not up to scratch.

I don't understand why this might be: the compiler produces native x86
(and presumably very good!) code for the user space code and for UNIX
system calls, they would be handled by the DLL with a secondary call into
the Windows kernel.

Does anyone have any performance comparisons between "Cygwin" apps and
native Win32 applications?  Is there any real performance penalty for
software with a high proportion of system calls?

Thanks,
Ben

---
Ben Elliston
<bje@air.net.au>

"For my birthday I got a humidifier and a de-humidifier. I put them in the same
 room and let them fight it out." -- Steven Wright

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
