From: bhunter@cat.bbsr.edu (Bill Hunter) Subject: gnu-win32 vs OpenNT 2.0 15 Apr 1997 17:39:39 -0700 Approved: cygnus.gnu-win32@cygnus.com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <01BC49C7.956B7BA0.cygnus.gnu-win32@BILLHOME> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Original-To: "gnu-win32@cygnus.com" X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by cygnus.com id OAA01541 Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32@cygnus.com Has anyone compared gnu-win32 to attempted commercial equivalent(s)? I'm seem to recall that the recently released OpenNT 2.0 - purported to be a *NIX clone that runs under and cooperates with Windows NT - was going to be written with some special blessing (and knowledge transfer) from Microsoft. Has it benefited from this? Is it more stable than the admirable-but-still-beta gnu-win32? - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".