From: fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: newlib vs glibc 26 Mar 1997 09:59:56 -0800 Approved: cygnus.gnu-win32@cygnus.com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <199703260606.RAA03386.cygnus.gnu-win32@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Content-Type: text Original-To: gnu-win32@cygnus.com (gnu-win32) In-Reply-To: <3337BCBE.1448@netcom.com> from "Jim Balter" at Mar 25, 97 03:53:34 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32@cygnus.com Jim Balter wrote: > > [...bug in bsearch()...] A better fix is to replace bsearch.c > with the simpler, more efficient, and more comprehendable one from > glibc (in fact, all of newlib should be replaced with glibc, but that's > another story): So why do we have two C libraries? -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".