From: shankar@chromatic.com (Shankar Unni)
Subject: Re: Cygnus Cygwin32 Press Release 1/21/97
11 Feb 1997 20:28:49 -0800
Approved: cygnus.gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <199702111745.JAA06764.cygnus.gnu-win32@hatchet.chromatic.com>
Content-Type: text
Original-To: Paul@chocolat.foobar.co.uk (Paul Shirley)
Original-Cc: gnu-win32@cygnus.com
In-Reply-To: <2AUWrCAMx2$yEwOt@foobar.co.uk> from "Paul Shirley" at Feb 10, 97 06:43:24 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32@cygnus.com

Paul Shirley said:

> No. What they are saying is you can make money under the LGPL licence
> terms *or* pay them some money for normal commercial terms (ie no
> source/object distribution required)

Notice that Jeremy Allison said very clearly that it was the *GPL* (not
the *LGPL*), which changes the terms of the agreement quite dramatically.

-- 
Shankar Unni                                  shankar@chromatic.com
Chromatic Research                            (408) 752-9488
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".