From: knight@iname.com (Warren & SLS Knight)
Subject: RE: Why is cygwin.dll?
17 Jan 1997 00:35:10 -0800
Approved: cygnus.gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <01BC03FE.3AACA220.cygnus.gnu-win32@knight.dircon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Original-To: GNU-WIN32 <gnu-win32@cygnus.com>
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32@cygnus.com

Grant if you are interested in compiling original programs
using gcc, but don't want the overhead of cygwin.dll
look at the minimalist GNU-Win32 information at
http://www.fu.is.saga-u.ac.jp/~colin/mingw32.html.
It will allow you to compile native Win32 software, last
time I looked instructions for setting it up under b17 is not
given at this time.  But it is definitely doable after a little
trial and error.

Now if you want to compile Unix apps stick with
the straight gnu-win32 setup.

Warren



----------
From:  Grant Leslie[SMTP:grantl@deerinet.nb.ca]
Sent:  Thursday, January 16, 1997 1:40 AM
To:  GNU-WIN32
Subject:  Re: Why is cygwin.dll?

<<CUT>>
assume. I'm sure it would be nice to make simple programs that don't
require cygwin.dll I even think I read somewhere about Cygnus working out
how to do this. Though you would probably still end up with an exe much
larger than one that uses cygwin.dll.

-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".


-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
