From: rel@artech.com.uy ("Roberto E. Lublinerman")
Subject: GCC from CYGWIN-32 or from GNAT
31 Oct 1996 14:49:38 -0800
Sender: daemon@cygnus.com
Approved: cygnus.gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=ARTech%l=ANSINA961031173047GA005C00.cygnus.gnu-win32@ansina.artech.com.uy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BBC751.41BD6430"
Original-To: "'gnu-win32@cygnus.com'" <gnu-win32@cygnus.com>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.12.736
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32@cygnus.com

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.  Contact your
mail administrator for information about upgrading your reader to a version
that supports MIME.

------ =_NextPart_000_01BBC751.41BD6430
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Maybe this is not the right place to place this question, but.....

What is the diference between the GCC from Cygnus and the one provided with
GNAT?

The one that comes with GNAT seems to be pretty stable, though.




------ =_NextPart_000_01BBC751.41BD6430--
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
