From: randolph@pcx.ncd.com ("Randolph Fritz")
Subject: Threads vs. stdio
17 Oct 1996 15:37:23 -0700
Sender: daemon@cygnus.com
Approved: cygnus.gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <9610171204.ZM22261.cygnus.gnu-win32@hood.pcx.ncd.com>
References: <199610170938.SAA27561@bird.fu.is.saga-u.ac.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: Colin Peters <colin@fu.is.saga-u.ac.jp>
        "Minimalist GNU-Win32" (Oct 17,  6: 38pm)
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.1 04apr94)
Original-To: gnu-win32@cygnus.com
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32@cygnus.com

Ok, folks!

I'm writing a test program that involves a lot of simultaneous file copies.  My
strategy for this is to create one thread per copy operation.  Will this be
reliable with cygwin?  Will I be able to use the standard i/o libraries from
the sub-threads, as long as I don't do anything silly?


-- 
Randolph Fritz
QA consultant
NCD/PCX division
randolph@pcx.ncd.com

-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".
