Date:	Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:18:59 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Should a non-programmer use pgcc?
Message-ID:	<20001001011859.D16985@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20000930184215 DOT 00b56490 AT pop5 DOT ibm DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4.3.1.2.20000930184215.00b56490@pop5.ibm.net>; from geeyoff@zerohour.net on Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 06:49:58PM -0400
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.17 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.95.2 19991024 (release))
X-Copyright:	copyright 2000 Marc Alexander Lehmann - all rights reserved
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 06:49:58PM -0400, Geoff Stanbury <geeyoff AT zerohour DOT net> wrote:
> am using an i686 linux system.  I would like to know how to compare 
> programs compiled with PGCC to those compiled with GCC, so as to see what 

pgcc is not that much directed at programmers but at power users - if
you love tweaking compiler switches for optimal performance pgcc is for
you. If not, you should better stay with the standard gcc disribution
which is much easier to handle.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -