Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:37:17 +0100
From:	Marc Lehmann <marc AT gimp DOT org>
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: pgcc-2.95.2 illegal instruction
Message-ID:	<20000127143717.F2602@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10001251945360 DOT 26380-100000 AT Cordes DOT Phys DOT Dal DOT Ca> <388EE3FB DOT D4B08E8D AT informatik DOT fh-wiesbaden DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<388EE3FB.D4B08E8D@informatik.fh-wiesbaden.de>; from Christoph.Weyer@informatik.fh-wiesbaden.de on Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 01:09:31PM +0100
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.14 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release))
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 01:09:31PM +0100, Christoph Weyer <Christoph DOT Weyer AT informatik DOT fh-wiesbaden DOT de> wrote:
> > I'm curious, what instruction was it?  (you can probably use gdb's
> > disassemble command to see instructions surrounding the place where it
> > failed.)

The problem seems to be that the compiler was configured for a pentiumpro+
target, which means that it's runtime libraries might (and obviously do)
contain pentiumpro instructions.

The solution would be to configure for a i586 target. AFAICS this means
that the nbinary distribution of the Pentium-GCC will not run on the
pentium ;(

This problem didn't show up earlier since earlier versions of gcc/pgcc
weren'T very aggressive about using cmov..

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -