Date:	Fri, 26 Nov 1999 02:29:11 +0100
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT opengroup DOT org>
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Cc:	antonios DOT proios AT wmich DOT edu
Subject:	Re: pgcc died when ...
Message-ID:	<19991126022911.A4036@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com, antonios DOT proios AT wmich DOT edu
References:	<Pine DOT PMDF DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 991125180911 DOT 557845116A-100000 AT WMICH DOT EDU>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.PMDF.3.96.991125180911.557845116A-100000@WMICH.EDU>; from antonios.proios@wmich.edu on Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 06:18:12PM -0500
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.13 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release))
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 06:18:12PM -0500, antonios DOT proios AT wmich DOT edu wrote:
> My reply address: 99PROIOS AT WMICH DOT EDU

if that is your reply address then why don't you use it? ;)

> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i586-pc-linux-gnu/pgcc-2.91.66/specs
> gcc version pgcc-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release)

This is a very old version. Chances are good that this has been fixed in
cvs (or in 2.95.2)

> I wanted to try the newer one because I have been having crashes with any
> kernel compiled with -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro  when trying to run

Apart from testing compatibility it is not a good idea to compile the
kernel with pgcc (or at leats not with high optimization levels). It will
only grow in size.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -