Date:	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 23:24:53 +0200
To:	"'pgcc AT delorie DOT com'" <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: K7 potentials
Message-ID:	<19990708232453.A24204@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To:	"'pgcc AT delorie DOT com'" <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC011703C7 AT nl0006exch003u DOT nl DOT lucent DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 9907081411200 DOT 19614-100000 AT legolas DOT mdh DOT se>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.05.9907081411200.19614-100000@legolas.mdh.se>; from Henrik Berglund SdU on Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 02:27:30PM +0200
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.2.10 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3)
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 02:27:30PM +0200, Henrik Berglund SdU wrote:
> > My chess program is also using long longs and is miscompiled by
> > pgcc-1.1.3 as well. With pgcc-1.1.1 I do not experience problems.
> Seems like something went wrong between release 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.
> Have a k6-2 and 1.1.1 optimized better than the latest release.

This indicates that Jan was correct  in diagnosing that egcs had much worse
k6 support than pgcc, since I dropped the pgcc K6 support in favour of the
(presumably) better k6 support in egcs. It would be interesting to know how
the pgcc snapshots performa relative to pgcc-1.1.1.

Any volunteerss to port the changes back?

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

- Raw text -